Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matthew Ebden vs Daniel Cox Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ebden vs Cox analysis and find out who is favored!
Matthew Ebden vs Daniel Cox Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ebden 2 - 0 Cox
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ebden has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Cox has won 48.84%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ebden, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cox has won 53.55%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.21% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ebden has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cox has saved 47.83% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ebden has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Cox winning 59.18% (W/L 29/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ebden has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 65% (W/L 96/ 52), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 31% (W/L 17/ 38). Cox has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 235/ 117), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 26/ 30).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Ebden winning 2 times and Cox being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Ebden winning 4 and Cox winning 0. The last match between Ebden and Cox was at the Cremona Challenger, 19-05-2011, Second, Hard with Matthew Ebden getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:36:57.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ebden and Cox have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ebden winning 0 times and Cox 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ebden winning 0, and Cox 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ebden has played against opponents with an average rank of while Cox has played against players with an average rank of 161.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ebden has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cox has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ebden has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cox has converted 38.06% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
738
Rank
39
High
36
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
598
Rank
206
High
33
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
56% (478-379)
Career Total W/L
61% (436-284)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
67% (12-6)
$1,387,350
Career Prize Money
$37,845
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Matthew Ebden vs Daniel Cox For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Ebden VS Cox
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Matthew Ebden | Daniel Cox |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| DFs Total | 4 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:36:57 | 0:36:57 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (46/66) | 55% (28/51) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (35/46) | 50% (14/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 30% (6/20) | 57% (13/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (24/51) | 38% (25/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats 
Matthew Ebden
Player
Daniel Cox
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matthew Ebden | Daniel Cox |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (12/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 65% (24/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (187/149) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (10/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.39 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 64 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:22:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 81.17 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 66% (673/1019) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 73% (488/673) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (169/346) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 38% (51/134) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (455/1087) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (8/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (12/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (3/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (11/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (11/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 14% (7/1) |
Matthew Ebden Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Matthew Ebden
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
10
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
6
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Soon-Woo Kwon
Player
Matthew Ebden
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
7
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Matthew Ebden
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matthew Ebden
Player
Zizou Bergs
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Matthew Ebden
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
13
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
45 of
54)
69%
(
24 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
23 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
20 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Ebden
Player
Stefan Kozlov
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
24%
(
5 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Matthew Ebden
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
6
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Matthew Ebden
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Matthew Ebden
59%
(
83 of
141)
1st Serve %
65%
(
93 of
142)
4
Aces
23
6
Double Faults
8
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
67 of
93)
48%
(
28 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
49)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
58 of
141)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
58 of
142)
141
Total Points Won
142
|
6-7(3) 7-6(5) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Matthew Ebden
Player
Dominic Stricker
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
13 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Cox Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Daniel Cox
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
74%
(
64 of
87)
1st Serve %
73%
(
74 of
101)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Daniel Masur
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Daniel Cox
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Daniel Cox
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
33 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Jerome Kym
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Leonardo Rossi
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Andrea Guerrieri
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
0-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Daniel Cox
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Hynek Barton
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ebden Vs Cox Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Ebden are available here and Cox photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
